-Galla S Kiran Kumar,Bureau Chief Telagana (Andhra Pradesh)
The High Court has issued its verdict on the petition filed by TDP chief Chandrababu seeking anticipatory bail in the case registered against him by Mudivedu police of Annamaiya district in the Angallu incident.
Amaravati: The High Court has issued its verdict on the petition filed by TDP chief Chandrababu seeking anticipatory bail in the case registered against him by Mudivedu police of Annamaiya district in the Angallu incident. The verdict was granted granting anticipatory bail. Rs. The court said that a bond of Rs.
On August 8 this year, the police registered a case against TDP leaders along with party chief Chandrababu in the incident that took place at Angallu Koodali while going to inspect irrigation projects. Chandrababu approached the High Court for anticipatory bail in this case. Speaking on behalf of the petitioner, senior advocate Posani Venkateshwarlu said that it was the ruling party who threw stones at Chandrababu’s convoy in the hearing held on Thursday. It was explained that the personal security personnel were protecting Chandrababu. The related videos were handed over to the court. It is said that the people from Vaikapa made a false complaint four days late for the attacks. The reasons for the delay have not been given. He said that the rally was organized only after taking prior permission from the police to visit the irrigation projects. They said that stones were pelted with a pre-planned plan to create chaos in the rally. He reminded that the High Court had granted anticipatory bail to several accused in the same case. The Supreme Court also upheld that order. Anticipatory bail was sought for the petitioner.
Additional AG Ponnavolu Sudhakar Reddy heard arguments on behalf of the police. He said that the incident of attack took place at the instigation of the petitioner. The petitioner and his followers have taken the law into their hands. He said that he should have acted responsibly as a former chief minister. He said that the police were injured because of the petitioner’s request. He said that there is no truth in filing the case with political revenge. He asked to dismiss the bail petition. After hearing the arguments of both sides, the court reserved the verdict and issued it today.
