-Galla S Kiran Kumar,Bureau Chief Telagana (Andhra Pradesh)
On the same day.. during the trial of three different cases, the High Court severely criticized the state government’s style of dealing. The government has stopped the supply of electricity to the granite industry due to Rs. 40 lakh arrears.
Electricity cut off to granite industry due to Rs 40 lakh arrears
High Court
‘s sharp remarks Attended hearing and explained Special CS, CPDCL CMD SPDCL CMD
Santhosh Rao, EE Karim Contempt of court cases sumoto
today – Amaravati
On the same day.. during the trial of three different cases, the High Court severely criticized the state government’s style of dealing. The government has stopped the supply of electricity to the granite industry due to Rs. 40 lakh arrears. ‘When will the people take the power of your government, which owes lakhs of crores of rupees’, she asked bitterly. If the ministers are proudly announcing in the legislature that the state has no financial problems, then why are they not paying the dues to the monopolists, employees and pensioners and why are they having to go to court for them? It is said that the government is making the monopolists like thieves by not paying the bills. The High Court directly questioned the state government about the authority to divert the funds allocated to the SC Corporation to Navratnas.
The power connection was removed due to the fact that the granite industry owed Rs. 40 lakhs.. And the state government, which owes lakhs of crores of rupees to the people who had done various works, said that when should the people steal the power. Questions were hurled at Special Principal Secretary (SCS) K.Vijayanand, CPDCL CMD Janardhan Reddy, concerned SE Satyanarayana, EE Syed Abdul Karim and others who attended the hearing and ignored their orders to restore power supply so that the workers would not be stranded. Do you want to be above the law? Due to the behavior of the higher officials in the implementation of the court orders, it was alleged that the lower level staff were deceiving the courts by submitting false details. If the court orders are not implemented.. Prakasam District Cheemakurti has severely criticized CPDCL Executive Engineer Syed Abdul Karim for making inappropriate comments. The High Court ordered the registry to register a case of contempt of court against him and send notices. Vijayanand and Janardhan Reddy assured that action will be taken against those who neglected the execution of the court order, and the trial was adjourned for four weeks. Apart from Abdul Karim, the other officers were exempted from attendance. High Court judge Justice Battu Devanand gave orders to this effect on Friday. Apart from Abdul Karim, the other officers were exempted from attendance. High Court judge Justice Battu Devanand gave orders to this effect on Friday. Apart from Abdul Karim, the other officers were exempted from attendance. High Court judge Justice Battu Devanand gave orders to this effect on Friday.
Officials stopped power supply to VL Ganapati Granites Industry of Prakasam district due to non-payment of dues of over Rs.40 lakhs. Ganapati Granites approached the High Court with this. On December 16, the judge who conducted the inquiry gave an interim order to restore the electricity supply with the intention that many depend on the industry for their livelihood and their livelihood should not be damaged. The hearing was adjourned to the 3rd of this month. Naidu Sivaramakrishna Reddy, advocate for Ganapati Granites, while hearing the arguments in the hearing held on January 3, said that the electricity was not restored. It is said that the officials not only refused to receive the court order but also made inappropriate comments on the court. A CD was produced before the court claiming to have recorded those comments by the petitioner. After considering them, the judge ordered the officials to appear on the 6th of this month and give an explanation.
People are of no use if IAS sit in AC rooms
In the hearing held on Friday, EE Karim admitted that he was wrong. The judge asked Special CS Vijayanand to tell what action will be taken against him. The judge expressed impatience when Vijayanand replied that he would examine the records. He asked what is the point of examining the records after admitting the mistake in your presence. ‘Your administration is like this so the behavior of the lower level officials is like that. Everything is fraud in your department. Not if IAS officers sit in AC chambers. Know the facts. Otherwise, the people will have no use for anything’, he said.
CMD Santosh Rao is the judge who found fault
The judge stated that the officials were deceiving the court. APSPDCL CMD Santosh Rao has been ordered to attend the inquiry on 5th of this month in a case. His lawyer told the court that he could not come because he was bedridden due to illness. In order to know whether it is true or not, Vijayanand was advised to call the CMD right now from your cell phone and find out if he is on duty or on leave on the 5th of this month. Vijayanand said that Santosh Rao was with him in Elur that day. The judge remarked that it is now known how the authorities are deceiving the court. He questioned whether it would be difficult to attend the court and give an explanation. The registry was ordered to immediately register a case of contempt of court against Santosh Rao and issue a notice.
Due to the behavior of the GPs, the officials were brought before the court
Speaking on behalf of the electricity distribution companies, Standing Counsel VR Reddy expressed doubt that the Ganapati Granites Company will not pay dues in the light of the restoration of electricity. The judge said that there is no need for such concern. The government lawyers often have to stand before the court because the government lawyers do not give proper advice. In this case, if the EE level officials said that they will not implement the court order, then we can understand whose advice is behind it. Addressing VR Reddy, he commented that the responsibility of the authorities in not implementing the orders of the court is the same as yours. He said that he attended the hearing after all his efforts to avoid the implementation of the court’s orders failed. The hearing was adjourned for four weeks.
