Dr.Thomas (Special Correspondent)
India has many political parties—both national and regional. Within these parties, countless sincere and dedicated workers spend their entire lives serving the organization and upholding its ideology.
Through years of commitment, they are often honored with various responsibilities at the party level and, in some cases, entrusted with positions in government.
However, an important question arises. These individuals devote their time, energy, and personal lives to the party.
They endure struggles, sleepless nights, financial hardships, and immense pressure while working tirelessly to strengthen the organization.
Unfortunately, much of this sacrifice remains unseen by the public.Their dedication, patience, and long years of service are rarely acknowledged in moments of crisis.
The real challenge emerges when allegations—sometimes unverified or politically motivated—are made against such leaders.
In many instances, parties quickly distance themselves and expel them from all positions, often without waiting for due process or judicial clarity.
This reaction may be driven by political pressure or the fear of reputational damage. Yet, the irony is that years later, when courts finally clear these individuals of wrongdoing, the damage to their political careers is already irreversible.
Their reputation, influence, and opportunities are lost, and the years they could have contributed further are gone.
There are several examples that illustrate this harsh reality. One notable case is that of former Kerala Chief Minister K.Karunakaran.He resigned from his position following allegations in a controversial case.
Later, the court found the accusations baseless and even directed compensation to be paid. However, by the time justice was delivered, the political and personal cost had already been paid. His career had suffered, and the consequences could not be undone.
Such instances highlight the need for political parties to act with greater wisdom and fairness. Decisions regarding suspension or expulsion should be taken carefully, with respect for due process and the principle of “innocent until proven guilty.”
Parties must balance protecting their image with protecting the dignity and contributions of long-serving members.
Political organizations should consider temporary measures, internal inquiries, or conditional roles instead of immediate expulsion.
This approach would preserve both the party’s credibility and the individual’s dignity. Ultimately, justice delayed should not become justice denied—not only in courts, but also within political institutions.
Leaders who dedicate their lives to public service deserve thoughtful consideration, not rushed judgments. A more compassionate and balanced approach will strengthen democratic values and ensure that loyalty and sacrifice are not forgotten in moments of controversy.
